OPTIMALISASI PENILAIAN DIRI DAN SEJAWAT DALAM MENINGKATKAN KEMAMPUAN MENDESAIN MODUL AJAR BAGI MAHASISWA CALON GURU FISIKA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.20527/jbse.v4i2.263Keywords:
kurikulum merdeka, mahasiswa calon guru fisika, modul ajar, penilaian diri dan sejawatAbstract
Proses penyederhanaan Rencana Pelaksanaan Pembelajaran ke dalam bentuk modul ajar dalam implementasi kurikulum merdeka di sekolah masih menimbulkan banyak kendala di lapangan. Kendala ini juga dirasakan oleh mahasiswa calon guru ketika menjalani praktik mengajar di sekolah. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengatasi permasalahan yang muncul sehubungan dengan pengembangan modul ajar dengan mengoptimalkan metode self dan peer assessment bagi mahasiswa calon guru fisika. Penelitian ini melibatkan seluruh mahasiswa pendidikan fisika dari Universitas Lambung Mangkurat (ULM) yang mengikuti program Asistensi Mengajar pada tahun 2023. Data penelitian diambil dari portofolio modul ajar yang dibuat oleh mahasiswa selama pelaksanaan asistensi mengajar, termasuk hasil karya mereka setelah menerapkan self dan peer assessment. Hasil analisis menunjukkan peningkatan yang signifikan dalam kemampuan mahasiswa merancang modul ajar, dengan rata-rata awal sebesar 62,0 meningkat menjadi 82,8. Jika dinyatakan dalam gain score, peningkatannya adalah sebesar 0,52 (berkategori sedang). Penelitian ini memberikan kontribusi dalam upaya terus-menerus untuk menyempurnakan implementasi Kurikulum Merdeka dan meningkatkan keterampilan pedagogis para calon pendidik Fisika, serta memberikan kontribusi berharga dalam bidang pendidikan. Kata kunci: Mahasiswa Calon Guru Fisika, Modul Ajar, Penilaian Diri dan Sejawat. Simplifying the Lesson Plans into Teaching Modules within implementing the Merdeka Curriculum in schools continues to encounter various challenges. Student teachers also experience these challenges during their teaching practice. This research aims to address the issues arising from the development of teaching modules by optimizing the methods of self and peer assessment for prospective Physics teachers. The study involves all Physics Education students from Universitas Lambung Mangkurat (ULM) participating in the Teaching Assistance program in 2023. Research data is derived from teaching module portfolios created by students during the teaching assistance period, including their work after implementing self and peer assessment. The analysis reveals a significant improvement in students' ability to design teaching modules, with an initial average score of 62.0, increasing to 82.8. Expressed as a gain score, this represents an improvement of 0.52 (categorized as moderate). This research contributes to the ongoing efforts to refine the implementation of the Merdeka Curriculum and enhance the pedagogical skills of future Physics educators, providing valuable insights into the field of education. Keywords: Physics Teacher Candidates, Teaching Module, Self and Peer Assessment.References
Boud, D., & Molloy, E. (2013). Rethinking models of feedback for learning: The challenge of design. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 38(6), 698-712.
Falchikov, N., & Goldfinch, J. (2017). Evaluation of assessment: Student perspectives on an integrative assessment process. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 42(4), 539-556.
Hake, R. R. (1999). Analyzing change/gain score. American Educational Association’s Division D, Measurement and Research Methodology.
Hanushek, E. A., & Woessmann, L. (2015). The knowledge capital of nations: Education and the economics of growth. MIT Press.
Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81-112.
Kaur, G., & So, H. J. (2018). The impact of self-assessment on students’ learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 66(6), 1601-1620.
Kilpatrick, J. (2019). Education for a Human Society: Reconciling Freedom with Truth. Teachers College Press.
Marzano, R. J. (2017). The New Art and Science of Teaching. ASCD.
Sadler, D. R. (2010). Beyond feedback: Developing student capability in complex appraisal. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 35(5), 535-550.
Schunk, D. H. (2012). Learning Theories: An Educational Perspective. Boston: Pearson..
Suardipa, A., & Primayana, T. (2020). Pengukuran karakter di sekolah: Sebuah tinjauan literatur. Jurnal Pendidikan Karakter, 10(1), 1-16.
Sugiyono. (2017). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan: Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta.
Sudrajat, A. (2018). The Implementation of Character Education in Building Character of Student in School. Journal of Education and Learning, 12(4), 579-586.
Suryadi, D. (2019). Developing Physics Module for Senior High School Students to Improve Generic Science Skills. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1188(1), 012083.
Tippett, C. D., Milford, T. M., & Bourke, T. R. (2017). Classroom discourse and elementary science: Constructing, contesting, and negotiating meanings of evidence. Routledge.
Wiggins, G., & McTighe, J. (2005). Understanding by design. ASCD.
Yu, F. Y., Wu, T. T., & Yu, Y. T. (2017). A study of peer assessment in a blended learning environment: Accuracy, efficiency, and attitudes. Interactive Learning Environments, 25(6), 766-780.



















